New Discworld story: "Pseudopolis"
Feb. 1st, 2010 11:05 pmI've posted a new story based on Terry Pratchett's Night Watch:
Pseudopolis
Vimes/young Vetinari -- NC-17 -- 3,400 words
The only traces of the future Vetinari were the nose, the hands, and the stillness.
Warnings, if any (highlight to read): No particular warning.
Thanks to
giglet for beta!
If you haven't read Night Watch recently, there's a brief summary in the story notes.
Or you can read it on my nifty page on An Archive Of Our Own.
Pseudopolis
Vimes/young Vetinari -- NC-17 -- 3,400 words
The only traces of the future Vetinari were the nose, the hands, and the stillness.
Warnings, if any (highlight to read): No particular warning.
Thanks to
If you haven't read Night Watch recently, there's a brief summary in the story notes.
Or you can read it on my nifty page on An Archive Of Our Own.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/10 07:11 am (UTC)I have no idea how you just did that, but it was AMAZING.
I do believe I'll be thinking of this whenever I reread Vimes-Vetinari interaction.
Again, AMAZING.
*goes off to read end of Night Watch with new eyes*
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/10 09:18 am (UTC)*RUNS TO READ LIKE FIRE OMG*
♥
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/10 11:14 am (UTC)The "man from Pseudopolis" concept works really well for me, not least because you've made it feel like it also means "someone who is safe."
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/10 03:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/2/10 04:03 pm (UTC)If I look it as completely AU, though - it's breathtaking.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/10 05:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/3/10 03:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/3/10 03:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/3/10 03:43 am (UTC)The "man from Pseudopolis" concept works really well for me, not least because you've made it feel like it also means "someone who is safe."
I didn't really think of it that way when I was writing it, but it's true -- even without his great ambition, Vetinari even at this age will not have very many people it's safe to be vulnerable with.
(no subject)
Date: 2/3/10 03:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/3/10 03:45 am (UTC)Glad you found a way to enjoy it as AU, though!
(no subject)
Date: 2/3/10 03:47 am (UTC)Do you suppose Moist could be persuaded to set up a congress and a supreme court to take some of the burden off?
(no subject)
Date: 2/3/10 01:46 pm (UTC)I agree with you that they can't really afford a relationship, and neither can the city. But I doubt Vimes would want one -- he has Sybil, after all. And Vetinari would be very cautious in the first place, like you wrote. He's waited many years for a man from... Pseudopolis. But occasional, significant pause, adventures, could be easier to deal with.
Sybil is a rather more interesting case. Maybe she'd like to watch, or even to participate? Or teach Vetinari a thing or two about Vimes? After all, the martial, sorry, marital arts are an area where Vetinari probably doesn't have that much expertise, even after all those years.
(no subject)
Date: 2/5/10 05:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/8/10 06:12 am (UTC)Night Watch is my favorite Pratchett novel of all time, so I was totally prepared to dislike this just because it's Messing With My Book. but I loved it. The voices were spot on, it even had footnotes (yay footnotes!), and while I was reading it I was quoting the ending scene in my mind -- gave it a whole new meaning, just as you intended it should. :D (I was absurdly pleased to read the ending notes and find a link to that scene.) I'd love to see how you'd write a scene with Sybil involved -- it seems like one of those instances where Vimes would work himself into a panic and Sybil would say "oh for heaven's sake dear, I've already taken care of it" and he'd stop in mid-word and just stare at her.
<3! [/squeeing fangirl]
(no subject)
Date: 2/15/10 03:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/15/10 03:49 am (UTC)I can see Sybil arranging things, just as you say; she's certainly not going to be, as the Regencies say, "missish." And she knows the Patrician well enough to call him Havelock!
(no subject)
Date: 4/14/10 12:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11/10/10 12:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/10/11 05:02 am (UTC)Thank you so much for writing this. It's going to be a beloved and oft-reread favorite.
(no subject)
Date: 5/4/11 01:41 am (UTC)