resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Default)
You can probably identify how old a fanfic writer is by what the default verb is for removing a pair of pants.

I remember a lot of "slip" or "slide." These days I'm seeing a lot of "peel."

Didn't Trek writers used to have a verb that implied that the clothes separated at the seams? Or am I imagining that?
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Default)
I've read it a million times; I've written it myself: two guys are getting ready to fuck for the first time, and one says, "Do we need a condom?" and while they do that little dance of "I'm clean" and "I've been tested" and so on, I'm saying, "Noooo! It's not difficult or painful! In the time you've spent talking about it, you could have done it and gotten on with your sex scene!"

And -- I mean, now I can't believe I was surprised that people would kick up a fuss over wearing a mask, is what I'm saying.
resonant: Cat biting cake (Caaaaake)
Thanks to everyone who pointed out that AO3 now allows meta -- I've reposted my 2005 LJ post on how to write a sex scene.

How To Write a Sex Scene (2619 words) by Resonant
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: Original Work
Rating: Not Rated
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Additional Tags: Meta, Don't copy to another site
Summary:

Four tips for creating better sex scenes in erotic romance.



OMG, y'all, it was so hard not to edit. But I feel like it's cheating to edit things if the only purpose is to make Past Me look smarter. Plus if I started I'd never be able to stop.
resonant: It feels so good. (So good)
I got a nifty challenge in email this week: someone read my old notes on How To Write a Sex Scene and asked for more examples of what I mean when I say a sex scene has one zing and shouldn't have more than one.

So I'm looking for a story that has multiple sex scenes and does a good job of having each one do something a little bit different. If it's a newer story, of course it wouldn't be a hardship to read it, but really I'd love it if it were one of the old fandom classics that I would already be familiar with.

Anybody have suggestions?
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Default)
How do y'all feel about stories that are tagged for every different sex act? Wall Sex, Blowjob, Handjob, Anal Fingering, like that?

It bugs me so much that I notice I've actually begun to train my eyes not to look at tags at all. It seems so crass; describing a love story by detailing sex acts seems like describing a human being by breaking down the chemical content.

And yet, on the other hand, searchability! I can easily see how you might sit down at the computer one night and say, "Wow, I'm really in the mood to do a search on Clothed Frottage."
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Default)
Things I'm thinking while reading sex scenes (in ascending order of frequency)

1. Not thinking at all. Laughing, crying, aroused, and elated. OMG. Wow.

2. Eee, this is just what they need! This puts back together the heart that the first part of the story broke. I'm so happy now!

3. This is really well done. Wish I'd thought of it.

4a. What, all that buildup for two paragraphs that don't even tell me what specific act they're doing?
4b. What, two paragraphs of buildup and the entire rest of the story is finger-by-finger detail of sex between two people who are already aware they're in love?

5. Wait, you don't mean to tell me he's going to reward that sort of behavior? Oh, lord, he is.

6. [skim skim skim]

7. Nope. [back arrow]

8. Hm. Other people's arms must be a lot longer than mine are.

Hangups

Sep. 2nd, 2013 02:17 pm
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Default)
Enough real life. Let's play a game.

You give me a fannish character I'm reasonably familiar with, and for that person I will give you a hangup. You know: a sexual dysfunction, an unexpected inhibition or aversion, some perfectly ordinary thing he/she simply cannot handle.

If I'm *not* familiar with your character, maybe some other reader will join in.

-----

We have requests that I'm unable to fill:
Joe Dawson
John Winchester
Reese or Finch
Christopher Chant

Anybody want to take these on?
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Default)
From [livejournal.com profile] veronamay, a meme on "kink in fic." Or, in other words, an invitation to muse at length on what turns me on. No, that doesn't appeal in the slightest, does it?

Creature/Aliens: If this is in the sense of Aliens Made Them Do It? I'm a fan, and I've already yammered on about why, and posted recs.

If this is in the sense of characters loving aliens? or of characters becoming or being aliens? (which would cover some forms of wingfic, pon farr fic, etc.) -- still a fan.

I love the idea of a human learning his/her way around an alien's body and sexual response. I love the amount of experimenting, talking, questioning that this would require -- "Does this work for you? What happens when I do this?"

I also love the idea that an alien among humans would be craving someone with whom to be honest, someone who could see him as he really was.

Creatures/Aliens rec: Anna S.'s SGA story "An Aesthetic Solitary Thing."



Read more... )
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (smrt)
The spouse is reading a book about Shakespeare. It claims that Shakespeare must have had an unhappy marriage, because none of his plays are about happy marriages. The spouse scoffs at this. "Nobody wants to see a play that's like their marriage, and nobody wants their marriage to be like a play," he says. "If you're lucky, your marriage is the opposite of dramatic."

Remember "Moonlighting"? Remember how sexy Maddy and David were as they bickered and maneuvered and claimed not to feel what they were feeling? Remember how fast all that sexy went away as soon as they actually acted on what they felt?

And yet ... And yet. As a person, I like having a relationship that can be measured in decades. As a writer, I like a challenge. And I don't believe that there's no way to write an established relationship except as the grave of a romance or a backdrop for nonromantic derring-do.

You can write a long-term relationship that still has the romantic and sexual tension you need to keep the sex sexy. Not many people do, but you can.

Read more... )
resonant: It feels so good. (So good)
I was thinking today about slash tropes that I love and ones that don't do it for me, the way you do, when suddenly it occurred to me that a whole bunch of the ones I love the best are actually a sort of double cluster around a single zingy center: a gap between intimacy and sex, so that you have one for a time while you yearn for the other one.

Here: Sex first with no intimacy. That would cover:

• Sex pollen/pon farr/accidental aphrodisiac
• Aliens make them do it
• Undercover as gay (well, OK, that's usually just making out without intimacy, but still)
• Marriage of convenience/forced marriage
• Fuckbuddies + secret yearning

I suppose that if I mostly read het, I'd have to add "sleeping together only to conceive a child."

And if you turn it around -- unusually high levels of intimacy without sex -- you get:

• Hypothermia
• Last two people on earth/safehouse/forced into hiding with only each other
• Some forms of hurt/comfort
• Some forms of slavefic
• Truth serum/character rendered unable to lie/Truth or Dare
• Telepathy/bonding
• Circumstances force them to share a bed
• Body swapping

I mean -- that's a great list! That's like 60% of the stuff I love, right there.

(Now I don't understand why I don't care for rentboy stories. They fit squarely into Category One up there.)

Now you: What does your kink terrain look like?
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Huh?)
About 20% of the sex scenes I read happen with someone's pants and/or underwear around his ankles. And what I want to know is: Why??

I mean, do people find this hot? Is it just me who finds a person with pants around his/her ankles to be desperately, laughably un-sexy, almost as bad as a person wearing black socks and no pants?

Edited to add: Oh, god, [livejournal.com profile] shocolate has put her finger on what's so very unsexy about this: Guy with his pants around his ankles = guy sitting on the toilet.
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Fraser tongue)
So I wrote a nice little post about elements of the season, and then I started thinking about Misrule as applied to porn. You know, where masters serve their slaves, and women give orders to men, and everything is turned upside-down, often with copious amounts of alcohol ...

The Feast of Fools, as described by the Wikipedia. Note the early bishop's particular quarrel with the effects of the season on soldiers: Their military discipline is relaxed and slackened. They make sport of the laws and the government of which they have been appointed guardians. ... Does not the champion, the lion-hearted man, the man who when armed is the admiration of his friends and the terror of his foes, loose his tunic to his ankles, twine a girdle about his breast, use a woman's sandal, put a roll of hair on his head in feminine fashion, and ply the distaff full of wool, and with that right hand which once bore the trophy, draw out the thread, and changing the tone of his voice utter his words in the sharper feminine treble?
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Hands)
I've moved this series to my webpage. You can find it here.
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Vanilla)
I've moved this series to my webpage. You can find it here.
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Smutlet)
I've moved this series to my webpage. You can find it here.
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Not Like That)
I've moved this series to my webpage. You can find it here.
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Whoa)
First a random comment. Starbucks Chantico? Basically a nice big hot cup of Hershey's syrup. Though if you poured it into a cup of coffee, it would probably be pretty good.

Now the actual question.

Something I've noticed in a lot of slash is that the path from first kiss to naked about forty-five minutes, tops. They're pals and partners when the doorbell rings, and then before the pizza's cold they're doing things that involve latex.

This doesn't offend me. Sometimes it's really, really hot. And often it makes more sense from a narrative point of view, because once the two of them have done the really tough thing -- recognized that they're sexually attracted, and actually gathered up the guts to act on it -- it's really difficult to pull back and make them go slow without messing up the nice clean arc of the story.

What I'm curious about, though, is whether this is a purely narrative convention, or whether that's really the way it is in real life.

Because, see, I've never dated as an adult. The spouse and I met at eighteen, and immediately figured out that we were probably the only two people in the world who were this particular brand of odd, and that therefore if we stuck together we'd be making four people's lives happier. So I really have no sense of the proper sequence and duration of the stages of getting-sexually-involved, except the way teenagers do it.

So tell me what you think.

[Poll #501150]
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Invulnerable)
I dreamed I was a character in a crossover threesome by [livejournal.com profile] paian.

Read more... )
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Wombat)
[livejournal.com profile] littera_abactor has written an absolutely hilarious Aliens Made Them Do Something Other Than The Usual Slash Cliches story here. Stargate, with the best butchering of the English language I have ever read.

Also, if you haven't read all the comments on the Aliens Made Them Do It post, don't miss them, because there are fabulous comment stories by [livejournal.com profile] makesmewannadie, [livejournal.com profile] _aerye_, [livejournal.com profile] brighidestone, [livejournal.com profile] marinarusalka, [livejournal.com profile] valarltd, [livejournal.com profile] pandarus, and me. It's like a mini-fest!

Profile

resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Default)
resonant

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930 31   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags