Uh, no.

[resonant]

Also, today I encountered a HP sex scene in which the writer evidently meant "bollocks," but what she actually wrote was "bullocks."

It's quite a limber man who can have not just one but two bullocks between his legs.

[edited because a grammar geek needs a grammar geek icon]

Comments

[isiscolo.livejournal.com]

I read that one. Nothing like livestock to dampen a mood.

Moo!

[nyn.livejournal.com]

Oh dear god, BULLOCKS! bwahahahahhaha! oh, my.

::wipes eyes::

I just laughed at that for about five minutes. ow, my tummy.

...bullocks!

[kelliem.livejournal.com]

I don't suppose it was two Sandra clones... ;-D

[amberfox.livejournal.com]

*giggles wildly* Yet another fine example of why having spell-check does not eliminate the need for a beta reader. ^_^

[maryavatar.livejournal.com]

Ow, mental image. Ow. Rampaging cattle with a little guy flailing along behind...

O.o

[naomichana.livejournal.com]

Nora Roberts did that in a novel of hers I read once -- that is, used "Bullocks!" as an expletive put into the mouth of an Irish character. Your mental image is a lot better, though. ;)

[lobelia321.livejournal.com]

*giggles*

[resonant8.livejournal.com]

I mean, on the one hand you know it's probably what a friend of mine calls "a spill chicken error" (i.e. an American spell checker might very well flag the correct word and suggest the wrong one as a "correction"), but on the other hand, bullocks! Can't ... stop ... laughing ...