Text to speech to porn
Jul. 9th, 2011 11:12 amMy chapter of RWA isn't terribly helpful as a critique group. If there are twelve people at a meeting:
five of them are too nice to utter any criticism at all
our two published writers want to find out exactly what market category you picture your work going into, and then give you detailed step-by-step instructions on how you can precisely tailor your characters, conflicts, and word count to get you into some line of category romances.
So most of the time I don't bother to bring pages, but one thing that is useful is to hear your work read out loud by another person. Boy, that really draws your attention to, say, a sentence that has three words in it that end in -ly.
So I went looking for an application that would read selections out loud to me. And since I seem to be working with British characters at the moment, I went looking for applications with British voices, since the difference between "garridge" and "ga-rahge" could hypothetically throw off the whole rhythm of the sentence, right?
So I downloaded a free trial of GhostReader and then downloaded Graham, Peter, Lucy, and Rachel to read me my work in a fairly decent machine-voiced British.
And now I'm sitting in a coffee shop with headphones on, listening to Lucy, who seems quite a well-meaning sort, say, "Oh, fuck, that is so -- fuck --" in a dispassionate voice.
My life gets odder every year.
- five of them know a lot less about good writing than I do (a lot less; I should tell y'all about the great debate our e-mail loop had on the concept of "show, don't tell")
- three of those are also completely unfamiliar with fantasy, to the point where they say things like, "When you say 'elves,' you're speaking literally?!"
- and the other two don't see the difference between fantasy and paranormal romance. Which is a distinction that I don't feel equal to explaining in nice words, since as a fantasy lover I think of paranormal romance as "that shit that looks like fantasy but isn't."
- three of those are also completely unfamiliar with fantasy, to the point where they say things like, "When you say 'elves,' you're speaking literally?!"
So most of the time I don't bother to bring pages, but one thing that is useful is to hear your work read out loud by another person. Boy, that really draws your attention to, say, a sentence that has three words in it that end in -ly.
So I went looking for an application that would read selections out loud to me. And since I seem to be working with British characters at the moment, I went looking for applications with British voices, since the difference between "garridge" and "ga-rahge" could hypothetically throw off the whole rhythm of the sentence, right?
So I downloaded a free trial of GhostReader and then downloaded Graham, Peter, Lucy, and Rachel to read me my work in a fairly decent machine-voiced British.
And now I'm sitting in a coffee shop with headphones on, listening to Lucy, who seems quite a well-meaning sort, say, "Oh, fuck, that is so -- fuck --" in a dispassionate voice.
My life gets odder every year.
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 04:26 pm (UTC)And I must say, I think the fact that your life is trending toward increased oddity is a sign that you're Doing It Right. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 05:24 pm (UTC)...I dream in TTS, sometimes.
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:36 pm (UTC)Though I do have different tonalities set for various text attributes, and my squeaky italics voice is what I use to emphasize thoughts in my own head.
(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 12:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 06:23 am (UTC)OMG, that sounds odd!
LOLOL at 'squeaky italics voice!' I often find myself wondering what my LJ posts sound like in your TTS rendering. From a visual perspective, my online style is pretty overwrought. After years on line, I've developed an online voice that conveys LOTS OF EMOTION, to avoid any lack of tonal clarity. Of course this means italics, ALL CAPS, emoticons and other forms of emphasis litter my typing - so either your TTS has great fun reading out emphatic bits like, 'star' whatever blah 'star', or you've got a library of aural cues you've worked up for every possible online type convention.
I like wondering about these things. I can't get to know you beyond what text can convey, and my brain ponders this stuff in between times :D
(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 06:09 pm (UTC)A little of both. I can program in almost any behavior I want, but i actually screen out some things just to keep the figurative noise down. So I have alt voices for italics, bold, underline, strikethrough (he sounds kinda growly and grumpy), tiny and big fonts, etc. But things like "*emphasis*" are still read as "star emphasis star." Probably because that's how they read to me fifteen years ago, before I could reprogram the behavior, so my brain just interprets that correctly now without any intervening steps.
(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 06:32 pm (UTC)And, as always, the adaptability of the human brain to transform whatever we take in through our senses and make sense out of it, amazes me :)
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 05:32 pm (UTC)I'm sorry to hear your workshop group isn't more useful.
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 05:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 06:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 06:30 pm (UTC)*dies laughing*
And all I'll say is that I've yet to find a TTS program that can properly pronounce the name "Alastor."
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 06:41 pm (UTC)What are you working on?
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 11:10 pm (UTC)At least, this one does. Enough for a whole crowd. :D
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 11:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 12:57 am (UTC)(I'm sure my Sherlock obsession will be amply renewed when the new season starts.)
(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 01:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 02:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 02:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 06:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 02:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 06:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 02:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 06:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 06:52 pm (UTC)Writing groups are funny. I had an informal one a few years ago, and I brought in a gay musical I was writing. The group's response: It's too raunchy.
*boggles*
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 07:10 pm (UTC)I suppose in the minds of some people, "contains characters identified as gay" is practically the same thing as "involves explicit gay sex."
On the other hand, the spouse had a creative writing class (wow, could this have been in high school? I can't think when else he would have taken such a thing) in which some of the students did bring in their own personal porn. Thus sharing details about their inner lives that he would have been much happier not knowing about.
(no subject)
Date: 7/9/11 11:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 12:58 am (UTC)The speech is not completely natural, but it's much, much better than I remember it being.
(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 02:22 am (UTC)YES YES THIS. So much this! So STOP SHELVING IT WITH MY FANTASY, pleezkaythanx. I am shopping for elves and archaic weaponry and PLOT, not sexytimes in shining armour!
(no subject)
Date: 11/6/11 03:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 02:44 am (UTC)ahahaha! That's awesome.
(no subject)
Date: 11/6/11 03:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 05:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11/6/11 03:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11/6/11 04:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 06:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 06:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/11 11:53 pm (UTC)I don't know if you've had any podfic done of your work, but as someone who's done a fair amount of podfic of other people's work I'm genuinely surprised at how odd I feel about someone doing the same thing for a story of mine. The two times it's happened I've had this terrible moment of cognitive dissonance thirty seconds in and have turned them off. But that's on completed works, too, as opposed to drafting.
(no subject)
Date: 11/6/11 03:57 am (UTC)