I guess the concept that sometimes convictions are incorrect and need to be changed hasn't occurred to Rev. McFadden.
It's interesting that both McKim and Wallace seem to recognize that this decision to oust Andrew Cote is morally doubtful, since each seems to be pointing a finger at the other rather than standing up and claiming responsibility.
As a former (many years ago) Girl Scout, I wonder if they have a similar policy? I just looked over the national web site and, perhaps unsurprisingly, it's not saying one way or another.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 3/29/04 12:33 pm (UTC)It's interesting that both McKim and Wallace seem to recognize that this decision to oust Andrew Cote is morally doubtful, since each seems to be pointing a finger at the other rather than standing up and claiming responsibility.
As a former (many years ago) Girl Scout, I wonder if they have a similar policy? I just looked over the national web site and, perhaps unsurprisingly, it's not saying one way or another.